Mar 242005
 

Built with your secu­rity in mind, Fire­fox keeps your com­puter safe from mali­cious spy­ware by not load­ing harm­ful ActiveX con­trols. A com­pre­hen­sive set of pri­vacy tools keep your online activ­ity your business.

A spate of secu­rity flaws and updates, cul­mi­nat­ing in ver­sion 1.0.2 yes­ter­day, call that con­tention in ques­tion. Microsoft would have been hauled over the coals if it had been Inter­net Explorer, but peo­ple are will­ing to cut Fire­fox a lot of slack, because, um.. because it is not Microsoft.

The spate of vul­ner­a­bil­i­ties and the updates bring into ques­tion the assump­tion by many that Fire­fox is more secure than Microsoft’s Inter­net Explorer, one of the rea­sons many experts and ana­lysts have given for Firefox’s rapid climb from 0 to about 6 per­cent of the usages hare in the United States.

Every browser will have secu­rity flaws, it is just that none of them had mar­ket shares large enough for any­one to care. Now that Fire­fox is grow­ing rapidly, it’s flaws are get­ting vis­i­bil­ity. To be fair to Fire­fox, IE has done this emer­gency patch thing a lot more, so Mitchell Baker could still be right:

There is noth­ing that will be per­fect,” said Mitchell Baker, pres­i­dent and chief lizard wran­gler of the Mozilla Foun­da­tion, dur­ing a panel dis­cus­sion at PC Forum in Scotts­dale Ari­zona. (PC Forum is owned by CNET Net­works, pub­lisher of ZDNet UK.)
Still, Fire­fox, devel­oped by the Mozilla Foun­da­tion, won’t har­bour nearly as many secu­rity flaws as those that have Microsoft’s Inter­net Explorer, and increas­ing pop­u­lar­ity won’t change that, Mitchell predicted.

PS: (weasels out of con­tro­versy by stat­ing that) I still like tabbed brows­ing though. And the plu­g­ins are great.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

© 2012 etcetera Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Switch to our mobile site