Mar 302005
 

Sepi­a­mutiny has a link about a girl who has to write a paper on “Hindu” for a col­lege course, and asks for help from a ran­dom dude she accosted on IM (whose AOL pro­file said he was inter­ested in “Eat­ing Hindu Sculp­ture”), and who con­ve­niently hap­pened to be some­thing of a com­edy writer. He plays along, and in return for a promised $75, writes an essay that includes lines like:

Your actions in each life­time affect your karma, and if a Shu­dra watches dharma and greg, it will have a pos­i­tive effect on his karma, per­haps ele­vat­ing him into a class in which she will be allowed to study the Vedas and progress along its spir­i­tual path.

While the authen­tic­ity of the story is ques­tion­able (maybe an April Fool’s prank, accord­ing to Boing Boing), it is funny as hell and a nice (if slightly tan­gen­tial) segue to what I wanted to talk about:

An intrigu­ing premise for a book — a ghost writer com­ing out of the closet.

For nearly 15 years I wrote hun­dreds of let­ters that weren’t from me. They ranged from per­func­tory thank-you notes and expres­sions of con­do­lence, to exten­sive cor­re­spon­dence with the great and the good: politi­cians, news­pa­per edi­tors, bish­ops, mem­bers of the House of Lords. The pro­ce­dure I fol­lowed with a more inti­mate let­ter was to type it up, double-spaced in large font, and print it out. My employer — the sender of the let­ter — would then copy it painstak­ingly on to embossed notepa­per using a Mont Blanc pen and blot­ting paper, sign­ing it with a flour­ish at the bottom.

The book is start­ing to gen­er­ate a lot of buzz prior to its US release on April 12th — a classier Nanny Diaries maybe?

The Guardian has an excerpt.

Ghost-writing is not new. It might almost qual­ify as the old­est pro­fes­sion if pros­ti­tu­tion had not laid prior claim. And there is more than a ran­dom con­nec­tion between the two: they both oper­ate in rather murky worlds, a fee is agreed in advance and given “for ser­vices ren­dered”, and those who admit to being involved, either as client or service-provider, can expect neg­a­tive reac­tions — any­thing from mild shock and dis­ap­proval to out­right revul­sion. A pro­fes­sor at my old uni­ver­sity, a dis­tin­guished clas­si­cist with fem­i­nist lean­ings, was appalled when she heard what I did for a liv­ing and pro­nounced me “no bet­ter than a com­mon whore”. This — the whiff of whore­dom — is per­haps the main rea­son why peo­ple opt for absolute discretion.

  2 Responses to “Ghosting”

  1. […] t. After three years. Link: ‘Tutor­ing’ Rich Kids Cost Me My Dreams Per­haps, Laura should’ve con­sid­ered get­ting a tutor. PS: Cheats suck.
    Pub­lished in: Ran­dom on […]

  2. umm­m­m­mmm

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

   
© 2012 etcetera Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Switch to our mobile site