Bala’s sin­gu­larly orig­i­nal Pitham­a­gan was one of the bet­ter Tamil movies last year. It is about a young man brought up by an under­taker. He lives all his life in a ceme­tery, becom­ing an under­taker him­self when his fos­ter dad dies. He lives his life in iso­la­tion, with almost no con­tact with civ­i­lized soci­ety, ‘cept when burn­ing their corpses. He is unfeel­ing and cal­lous, his demeanour the same whether he is bury­ing a child or water­ing a plant. His vocab­u­lary is lim­ited: all that he does is bray a weird song loudly when burn­ing corpses. What hap­pens when this “child of God” tries to enter civ­i­lized soci­ety in the com­pany of an assort­ment of fringe characters?

Pitham­a­gan is also an illus­tra­tion of how one great artist can inspire another. Bala is a con­fessed Jayakan­than fan, and it is no sur­prise that the lead char­ac­ter in Pitham­a­gan draws some inspi­ra­tion from a Jayakan­than short story: ‘Nan­da­vanathi Oru Aandi’ — which is about an under­taker liv­ing in iso­la­tion, con­sid­ered “mad” by soci­ety because of his quirks, who is unfeel­ing and cal­lous and hap­pens to sing a song every time he buries a body. The sim­i­lar­i­ties end there, but the source of the char­ac­ter is unmistakable.

Bala is quite pos­si­bly the best young direc­tor in India today. On sec­ond thoughts, I think I’ll get rid of the qual­i­fi­ca­tion and state sim­ply: Bala is the best young film maker in India today. I say young, because he is only three movies old. All three of his movies are morose and inward-looking. Almost all the scenes fill you with a strange fore­bod­ing, even the funny ones. When I watched Mys­tic River, I was reminded of Nanda — not because the two movies were sim­i­lar, but because they both made you feel the same way.

Bala is com­mer­cially suc­cess­ful with­out mak­ing what lesser direc­tors refer to euphemisti­cally as “com­pro­mises.” He dares to pick uncon­ven­tional sub­jects and works hard on them. He chooses his actors after he has writ­ten the move — an unbe­liev­ably hard thing to do in Indian films. His films don’t preach — Bala under­stands that the role of art is to reflect life, not to change it. I hope he goes far.

PS : Bala wrote a won­der­ful series of auto­bi­o­graph­i­cal arti­cles in Vikatan (paid reg­is­tra­tion required) that go some way in explain­ing what makes him tick: he writes can­didly about being an aca­d­e­mic fail­ure and doing drugs; how his life changed after com­ing across works by peo­ple like Jayakan­than and Balu Mahen­dra among oth­ers. Here was a wastrel who used his love of art to res­cue him­self from obscu­rity. A film­maker who reads. Another rea­son to hope he goes very far.

  3 Responses to “Inspired Filmmaking”

  1. Pitham­a­gan was a good effort, but I thought Vikram’s char­ac­ter­i­za­tion and his per­for­mance was a lit­tle over-the-top at times, as if he had a rabies attack :-) The end­ing was con­ven­tional and it became an usual revenge story with the only dif­fer­ence being that the pro­tag­o­nist was not your usual hero. Surya, on the other hand was­cool and fun to watch.

  2. Yeah, but what I liked the most about it was that Bala was able to take just the hint of a char­ac­ter from a short story and develop it into a full blown movie.

    The end­ing was unsat­is­fac­tory like you say. I would rate Nanda as his best effort so far.

  3. […] Rumor has it that Sil­ver­Screen photo-op favorite, Ajithku­mar was coerced into part­ing with his advance after he decided to step out of his next project — direc­tor Bala’s Naan Kadavul. Reports in the ver­nac­u­lar press have been sug­gest­ing that Ajith was grilled by some hench­men report­edly sent by Bala after the actor refused to be part of Naan Kadavul. […]

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

   
© 2012 etcetera Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Switch to our mobile site