May 032005
 

An old copy of the Writer’s Hand­book lies around the house — fat and for­lorn — mov­ing from room to room. It’s read some, then left to lie for days (on end), a poor cousin to the Loli­tas that rest in peace in their right­ful places, mis­sion accom­plished, been read fully. Just when hopes fade, another day, another chap­ter, another hia­tus. When sought, it tries to sat­isfy: a Proulx boldly pre­dict­ing that no com­puter will ever replace the book; a Shel­don lob­bing soft­balls at him­self. Or a Micheal Dirda ask­ing, “One or Many?”

Yes, one or many? As in, the num­ber of books one reads in a lifetime.

Alle­giant one-book won­der (no, not Harper Lee, she was a one book won­der), repeat reader, ver­ba­tim quoter of lines, para­graphs and pages. Not whole chap­ters, those I haven’t seen. Pre­dictabil­ity has virtues: None of this (or this) to scar vul­ner­a­ble psyches.

Or desul­tory wan­derer, sam­pling wares from all over? Remem­ber­ing lit­tle (or so it feels), quot­ing even less. No names in mem­ory (‘cept Ver­non and Ignatius). Left with mere after­tastes from each book — some sweet, some spicy; some good; some not so good; all lifelong.

Know­ing Quoyle, but not Ignatius? Yes to Bel­low, but no to Mar­quez? Easy call to make: No thanks.

Here’s a hard one — One or many? At one time, that is.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

   
© 2012 etcetera Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Switch to our mobile site