Aug 152005
 

The Observer pro­files Julian Barnes, the odds-on favorite to win the Booker this year.

Barnes’s longlisted novel is Arthur & George. It is a story about Sher­lock Holmes’s cre­ator, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, but it does not, like the myr­iad of other books and plays with this start­ing point, draw on Doyle’s texts or on the deduc­tive tech­niques of his great detec­tive. ‘I delib­er­ately didn’t want to write a book that bounces off his work,’ Barnes has said.

The George in the title is George Edalji, a Birm­ing­ham solic­i­tor and the son of a coun­try vicar from Bom­bay who was a con­verted Parsee. In the nor­mal course of life, the two men would never have met, but in 1903, Edalji was con­victed of maim­ing horses in his father’s parish of Great Wyr­ley in Stafford­shire. The ‘Great Wyr­ley Out­rages’, as they were known, became a cause célèbre when Doyle took up the cud­gels in order to cor­rect what he regarded as legal injus­tice and racism. Doyle became to Edalji what Emile Zola was to Drey­fus. Barnes’s telling of the near-forgotten tale focuses on our appre­ci­a­tion of guilt, a guilt that the Vic­to­rian nov­el­ist also feels over his fad­ing love for his dying wife, Louise, and his grow­ing, uncon­sum­mated pas­sion for his wife-to-be, Jean Leckie.

Barnes threw him­self into research on the Edalji case and con­fronts his ver­sion of Doyle with the same doc­u­men­tary mate­r­ial that he uncov­ered in try­ing to piece together the truth. He chose to write the novel, he has said, partly because the case has almost van­ished from British his­tory. ‘It makes not a rip­ple any­where. It’s gone. I wrote about it because I couldn’t read about it.’

Given Barnes’s ret­i­cent nature (he decries the “Oprah­fi­ca­tion of emo­tions”), it’s not sur­pris­ing that he is the least well known of the favorites this year. The pro­file dis­cusses a lit­tle bit of con­tro­versy sur­round­ing Barnes, and if you know your Rushdie, you’ll react the same way I did: “Why is this con­tro­ver­sial again?”

Barnes lives in north Lon­don with his wife, lit­er­ary agent Pat Kavanagh, and it is this close asso­ci­a­tion with the can­ni­bal­is­tic pub­lish­ing scene that has drawn Barnes into con­tro­versy or, at least, into the gos­sip columns.

When Amis junior decided to leave his agent Kavanagh after 23 years so that he could throw in his lot with Amer­i­can agent Andrew Wylie, known as ‘the Jackal’, his old friend Barnes sev­ered all links, send­ing a let­ter in Jan­u­ary 1995 which con­tained a phrase that Amis has described as ‘a well-known col­lo­qui­al­ism. The words con­sist of seven let­ters. Three of them are fs’.

I sure hope his books are spicier than the con­tro­ver­sies he finds him­self in.

PS : Talk­ing of Sher­lock Homes and Arthur Conan Doyle, The New Yorker car­ried a fas­ci­nat­ing arti­cle a while back by David Grann, where he talks about the death of “the world’s lead­ing Sher­lock Holmes expert” under mys­te­ri­ous cir­cum­stances. The arti­cle isn’t online, but there are inter­views where the author dis­cusses the story here and here.

  5 Responses to “Man on Top”

  1. Some­how I lost inter­est in non-fiction. I have unsuc­cess­fully tried sev­eral times to start read­ing. Paa­vana just bought a whole slew of books writ­ten by Booker Prize winners.

  2. Fic­tion rules :) Ask her if she liked Ver­non God Little…

  3. Yes, she liked it. I read part of it and I found it unset­tling. How­ever, it felt like an appo­site com­men­tary of con­tem­po­rary America.

  4. Cool. I liked it a lot — it must surely be the fun­ni­est Booker win­ning book ever.

  5. A non-fiction account of the George Edalji case will be pub­lished by Pega­sus Elliot Macken­zie on the 6th March 2006 enti­tled ‘Conan Doyle and the Parson’s Son: The George Edalji case’ by Gor­don Weaver. For an overview of the book visit http://www.theplebeian.net

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

   
© 2012 etcetera Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Switch to our mobile site