I met a math­e­mati­cian a few weeks ago, and he spoke to me for a long time about the meta­phys­i­cal nature of com­plex num­bers, about how they are mys­te­ri­ous objects that
are but fronts for all the pro­found secrets they hide within them. If all these secrets were to be unlocked, you could (among other things) cure the world of all ills.

He looked like the aver­age math­e­mati­cian type to me, and using the Beau­ti­ful Mind as my sec­ond data point, I did some regres­sion analy­sis to arrive at the fol­low­ing conclusions:

Math­e­mati­cians are eccen­tric. Most of them seem to exhibit vary­ing degrees of weird­ness, and all of them are delusional.

I try to research my posts thor­oughly, so I painstak­ingly scoured the inter­nets, and it seems to me that the world at large agrees with my con­clu­sions. I also con­ducted an infor­mal sur­vey and all three respon­dents agreed with me whole­heart­edly. One of them was an engi­neer, and he told me that math­e­mati­cians were the only peo­ple he could call geeks, and still sleep well at night.

Now, the math­e­mati­cians seem to have got­ten wind of their unpop­u­lar­ity, which they are blam­ing on a vast lib­eral arts con­spir­acy. In an star­tling exhi­bi­tion of igno­rance of the the­ory of cause and effect, they are con­vinced that jokes such as this one

“How do you define an extro­vert math­e­mati­cian? Some­one who looks at your shoes when he’s talk­ing to you.”

have caused their unpopularity.

They have con­cluded that the only way to bur­nish their image is to sup with the devil, so they are orga­niz­ing joint con­fer­ences with writ­ers to mol­lify the artsy types, and con­vince them that physi­cists are worse.

If you want evi­dence of the prob­lem that con­fronts them, look no fur­ther than today’s news­pa­pers. Mil­lions of peo­ple now enjoy Sudoku puz­zles. For­get the pseudo-Japanese baloney: sudoku grids are a ver­sion of the Latin Square cre­ated by the great Swiss math­e­mati­cian Leon­hard Euler in the late 18th cen­tury. Yet these legions of ama­teur problem-solvers tackle puz­zles accom­pa­nied by the absurd asser­tion that “no maths is involved”. In parts of pop­u­lar cul­ture, math­e­mat­ics has become not so much the love that dare not speak its name as the love that doesn’t even know its name.

While there were some things that didn’t go accord­ing to plan,

[…] real math­e­mati­cians have mixed feel­ings about mass-market yarns that present their domain as the stamping-ground of eccentrics, or even lunatics. But, for the most part, they applaud the endeav­our to drama­tise the human strug­gle of math­e­mat­i­cal rea­son­ing. Only one (absent) lit­er­ary fig­ure really fell foul of the Mykonos mob: the Amer­i­can writer David Fos­ter Wal­lace, who in Every­thing and More wrote not a novel but a pur­ported his­tory of the math­e­mat­ics of infin­ity. The computer-science guru Mar­tin Davis counted “86 really egre­gious errors” in Wallace’s book. “Are we so hard up for approval from the human­i­ties that we have to accept this?” he thundered.

over­all I think the con­fer­ence was a suc­cess — there will be a comic book in 2007 about the devel­op­ment of 20th cen­tury maths. If noth­ing, that’ll win over the engineers.

Through the Inde­pen­dent Online Edition.

PS: The title of this post is unique. It is the first time Math­e­mati­cians and Cool have appeared in the same sentence.

  2 Responses to “Mathematicians And Cool”

  1. If we were to replace ‘Math­e­mati­cian’ with ‘Philoso­pher’, your post will still hold good. I think these two cat­e­gories are vastly sim­i­lar in their social behaviour.

  2. Yeah. Even engi­neers for that mat­ter — but that would be a same-side-goal :)

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

   
© 2012 etcetera Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Switch to our mobile site