The Times car­ries a longish con­ver­sa­tion between Salman Rushdie and Ginny Dougary. Dougary obvi­ously likes Rushdie a lot — and per­haps because of this Rushdie sounds a lot more relaxed, and talks in his usual free­wheel­ing man­ner about a whole lot of things. It’s the most “human” Rushdie inter­view I’ve come across, his usual sharp can­dor tinged with humor and graciousness.

He doesn’t care to use the word “brain­wash­ing” for what goes on in the ter­ror­ist train­ing camps and the madras­sas, say­ing it’s too loaded. But in the novel he shows, most feel­ingly, how you can per­suade peo­ple that they have been see­ing the world wrong, and that the world is not like that — the world is like this, and you must unlearn every­thing you have learnt in order to under­stand the truth.

Rushdie says he is embar­rassed about Grimus ([…] I want to hide when I see some­one read­ing it), and explains his petu­lant Booker accep­tance speech as his reac­tion to the “cru­elty” of peo­ple that “asked him to find a dif­fer­ent form of employ­ment” for­get­ting that it was his first book. And then adds philo­soph­i­cally, “I guess, with hind­sight, you shouldn’t ever try to get even because you always lose.”

  One Response to “Rushdie in Conversation”

  1. ‘Grimus’ and Klingons

    The one-man quote mis­sile con­tin­ues His book launch in Time and the Times (thanks, Sapna and Karthik). There’s a line about Klin­gons on the very first page of Shal­i­mar. Aren’t you wor­ried that a pop ref­er­ence like that will date the bo…

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

   
© 2012 etcetera Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Switch to our mobile site