I kind of knew it the first time I picked up Ham­let. Not to toot my own horn or any­thing, but it was quite obvi­ous to me after read­ing the sec­ond line of the play, the one that had some­one ask­ing some­one else to “stand, and unfold your­self” — this book was mul­ti­di­men­sional. Deep. Cryp­tic. It was preg­nant with hid­den mean­ing, and if you got a copy with bet­ter line spac­ing than mine, I am quite cer­tain there was a lot that you could have read between the lines.

From cryp­tic to cryp­to­graphic isn’t such a big leap, and Clare Asquith has made just that. She thinks, nay, knows that Shake­speare was a “sub­ver­sive who embed­ded dan­ger­ous polit­i­cal mes­sages in his work.”

She argues that the plays and poems are a net­work of cross­word puzzle-like clues to his strong Catholic beliefs and his fears for England’s future. Aside from being the first to spot this dar­ing Shake­spearean code, Asquith also claims to be the first to have cracked it.

It has not been picked up on before because peo­ple have not had the com­plete con­text,’ she explained this week­end. ‘I am braced for flak, but we now know we have had the his­tory from that period wrong for a long time because we have seen it through the eyes of the Protes­tant, Whig ascen­dancy who, after all, have writ­ten the history.’

Not to be judge­men­tal, but here’s an exam­ple of the code:

Sun­burn:

The sun rep­re­sented divin­ity, and so sun­burn denotes close­ness to God. Shake­speare described him­self as ‘tanned’ in Son­net 62.

Makes me yearn for Dan Brown.

Read the whole thing here. In case you are won­der­ing, I had to do sev­eral care­fully con­ducted searches using mul­ti­ple search engines to sort through all the Salman Rushdie news/profiles/reviews/interviews/conversations before I got to this article.

You’re wel­come.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

   
© 2012 etcetera Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Switch to our mobile site