10. You are con­vinced T.S.Eliot stole the name for his poem from a cou­ple of Indian guys.

9. You look for ways to read your office email through blog­lines.

8. You refresh blog­ger com­ment win­dows lots of times, to try and see if your name shows up as the word ver­i­fi­ca­tion graphic. (not yet.)

7. You hold hands with your wife a lot more, because it is a way to link to her. You also insist she hold your other hand.

6. Your favorite bev­er­ages are Google Juice and Bridal Beer.

5. When your employ­ees ask you for com­ments, you ask them for a track­back link.

4. You won­der if Atom feeds are edi­ble, and are rea­son­ably sure that blogrolls taste bet­ter than cin­na­mon rolls (which suck anyway).

3. You Copy­scape pro­tect emails to your mom.

2. You have mem­o­rized the IP addresses of all the gam­bling web­sites ever cre­ated, and can recite them back­wards and forwards.

1. When some­one asks you for your name, you go “a href equals http colon dou­ble slash www dot sto­chas­tica dot net Karthik” and ges­ture with your fin­gers to make sure the quotes don’t get lost and inval­i­date your xhtml.

PS: Yes it is a Fri­day. Yes I am bored.

 

Judge: “Mr. Thief, you are on trial for a very seri­ous crime. You killed the man­ager of a bank, and stole a lot of gold from their safe deposit vaults. The case against you is water­tight.

Mr. Thief: “Heh.

Judge: “Heh? That’s all you have to say about it?

Mr. Thief: “Heh is the sound of me laugh­ing self-righteously. I would like to let you know that I didn’t do it. It was an invis­i­ble man that killed the man­ager and stole all the gold.

Judge: “That’s bullsh.., I mean, impos­si­ble.

Mr. Thief: “When you have elim­i­nated the impos­si­ble, what­ever remains, how­ever improb­a­ble, must be the truth.

Judge: “You lost me there, what are you talk­ing about?

Mr. Thief: “Never mind, but I am stick­ing to my story. It was an invis­i­ble man that killed the man­ager and stole all the gold.

Judge: “Invis­i­ble man? That is sci­en­tif­i­cally impos­si­ble. Do you have any wit­nesses?

Mr. Thief: “As a mat­ter of fact, I do. I would like to call H.G Wells to the stand.

Judge: “But he is dead, I thought. Or maybe that’s Orson Wells.” Checks with some­one. “Yeah, they are both dead.

Mr. Thief: “Too bad, I will call Ram Gopal Verma instead. He made a movie called Gayab, and can use the sci­en­tific exper­tise he gained dur­ing the mak­ing of the movie to prove that invis­i­ble men are not impos­si­ble.

Judge: “I think you might have a point there. Even if I buy that for a minute, how do you explain all the gold in your house?

Mr. Thief: “Oh, that was stuff I pro­duced using alchemy.

Judge: “Huh? Ok, this is becom­ing a farce. Alchemy is a ridicu­lous expla­na­tion.

Mr. Thief: “Oh yeah? I will call Neal Stephen­son to the stand prove it is not that ridicu­lous.

Judge: “Dude, this is tir­ing. What are you smok­ing?

Mr. Thief: “If you must know, I read this on my way to court this morn­ing.

Sep 282005
 

The Guardian car­ries an inter­view by Emma Brockes with Stephen Hawk­ing, a refresh­ing piece that steers clear of the usual condescension-tinged-with-awe tone that most inter­vew­ers seem to adopt when talk­ing to him.

Start­ing off by telling us that it is wrong to “read him solely through his con­di­tion,” and that his curt tone “might as eas­ily be a sign of geek­i­ness or supe­ri­or­ity or intol­er­ance of non-scientists,” Brockes goes on to talk to Hawk­ing about a lot of things, incud­ing the effect of art on peo­ple (good art is rare, mediocre art sucks), his lat­est book — A Briefer His­tory of Time and most impor­tantly for us, Mar­i­lyn Monroe.

A Briefer His­tory of Time is not exactly String The­ory for Dum­mies. Like a lot of spe­cial­ists, Hawk­ing has trou­ble imag­in­ing what it might be like not to under­stand what he does, or rather, where the non-scientist’s under­stand­ing will be weak and where strong. The book’s range is there­fore a lit­tle eccen­tric, lurch­ing between explain­ing what a sci­en­tific the­ory is (“a model of the uni­verse”) and going into quan­tum mechan­ics in the kind of ver­tig­i­nous detail that makes you open your eyes very wide as you read. It is fas­ci­nat­ing, up to a point.

Hawk­ing com­mu­ni­cates by twitch­ing his cheek, and artic­u­lat­ing the sim­plest of thoughts takes him as long as 20 min­utes. After a bunch of scripted ques­tions about the book, Brockes switches over to live ques­tions, an “ardu­ous and time-consuming process.”

Behind his shoul­der, his assis­tant nods. There will now be some time for live ques­tions. Stu­pidly, given that I have read all about it, I fail to realise just how ardu­ous and time-consuming the process of live com­mu­ni­ca­tion is. If I did, I wouldn’t squan­der the time on ask­ing a joke, warm-up ques­tion. I tell him I have heard he has six dif­fer­ent voices on his syn­the­sizer and that one is a woman’s. Hawk­ing low­ers his eyes and starts respond­ing. After five min­utes of silence the nurse sit­ting beside me closes her eyes and appears to go to sleep. I look around. On the win­dowsill are framed pho­tos stretch­ing back through Hawking’s life. There are pho­tos of one of his daugh­ters with her baby. I notice Hawking’s hands are thin and taper­ing. He is wear­ing black suede Kickers.

Another five min­utes pass. There are pic­tures of Mar­i­lyn Mon­roe on the wall, one of which has been dig­i­tally manip­u­lated to fea­ture Hawk­ing in the fore­ground. I see a card printed with the slo­gan: “Yes, I am the cen­tre of the uni­verse.” I write it down and turn the page in my note­book. It makes a tear­ing sound and the nurse’s eyes snap open. She goes over to Hawk­ing and, putting her hand on his head, says, “Now then, Stephen,” and gen­tly wipes saliva from the side of his mouth. Another five min­utes pass. Then another.

Hawking’s assis­tant, who sits behind him to see what is going on on his screen, nods slightly. Here it comes: “That was true of one speech syn­the­sizer I had. But the one I use nor­mally has only one voice. It is 20 years old, but I stick to it because I haven’t found bet­ter and because I’m known by it world­wide.” That’s it? The fruit of 20 min­utes’ effort? This man is a Hercules.

Brockes con­fesses to Hawk­ing that when she thinks string the­ory, she imag­ines cheese strings and asks him how he visu­al­izes strings. Hawk­ing tries to say some­thing (I think the answer started with sev­enth let­ter of the alpha­bet), and then pulls back to tell her some­thing inane about the human brain. What­ever, prof.

But he does redeem him­self with this one:

I ask: “If you could go back in time, who would you rather meet, Mar­i­lyn Mon­roe or Isaac New­ton?” and after 10 min­utes he says in that voice that makes the bland­est state­ment sound pro­found: “Mar­i­lyn. New­ton seems to have been an unpleas­ant character.”

At least he has his pri­or­i­ties straight. Most of the time.

Full Inter­view

 

TransmissionImag­ine this for a moment: You are Hari Kun­zru. Don’t want to? Remem­ber you get to hang out with Zadie Smith a lot. Good, so now imag­ine this for a moment: You are Hari Kun­zru. Now read on.

You pitch a plot to your pub­lish­ers — a satir­i­cal plot span­ning mul­ti­ple con­ti­nents about a com­puter virus bring­ing together three oth­er­wise uncon­nected peo­ple — and they buy into it. Then you sit down to write the book, and real­ize you have no idea about the peo­ple to pop­u­late your plot with.

Hmm… you think. Hmm. Umm. Still can’t seem to come up with any­thing. Mean­while, a cou­ple of lunches with Zadie.

After a few days, you come up with three car­ica.., I mean, char­ac­ters: a desi engi­neer, a Bol­ly­wood actress and an Amer­i­can mar­ket­ing genius. You are very pleased with your­self, but when you go back to write the book, you real­ize some­thing else: the plot has no room for the mar­ket­ing genius. Reluc­tant to waste days of thought, you swiftly decide to add the guy to the book as an irrel­e­vant sub­plot. And in a stroke of genius, you decide to pay homage to your thought process by nam­ing the guy Guy Swift.

One more lunch.

Things start falling in place now and once you know who the char­ac­ters are, it is easy to pro­vide them with traits. Thus, the engi­neer is a nerdy self-made genius, drinks a lot of cof­fee, lacks social skills, is par­a­lyzed around women and wears shirts with brand names printed on them. He also hap­pens to be Indian so he has to have a dot­ing mom, a tough-loving dad and in a nod to the new real­ity, a sis­ter who works at a call cen­ter. Oh, and he is also a vir­gin and his house smells of curry. This is satire, after all.

Guy Swift is a mar­ket­ing genius: so he has to

1. Talk mostly in mean­ing­less mar­ket­ing lingo,
2. Be glib and full of him­self.
3. Have other traits you are aware of about any­one remotely con­nected with marketing.

The Bol­ly­wood actress? C’mon, you know by now. No? Ok, she is pretty and exotic, young and sen­si­tive, has bitchy mom who forces her to hang out with seedy old producers.

This is fer­tile ter­ri­tory. You are on a roll. Thus Guy’s wife is pretty, and a lit­tle con­fused about things in gen­eral. The Bol­ly­wood actresses cur­rent co-star is also full of him­self, and in a bril­liant take on con­tem­po­rary Bol­ly­wood, he used to have a girl­friend who used to be Miss World. When she decided to break up with him, he got into trou­ble by mak­ing threat­en­ing phone calls to her. To avoid lit­i­ga­tion how­ever, you insert a line about this guy (not Guy) los­ing one of his roles to Salman Khan. So Cool.

And so on and so forth. I am sure you are tired of being Kun­zru. Plus he lives in Lon­don, where the food is rumored to suck.

Now for the real review, which you can read with­out imag­in­ing anything.

So yes, the char­ac­ters are a bit hack­neyed. And also yes, I do know it is sup­posed to be a satir­i­cal take on the con­nected world and a com­men­tary on our depen­dence on com­put­ers, but some of this stuff is so overused it is not really funny any­more. (The desi engi­neer and mar­ket­ing exec car­i­ca­tures: Heard of Dil­bert? Or the ABCD vs FOB fights at every sin­gle Indian dias­pora web­site that has com­ments enabled?)

In spite of this, the book was an enter­tain­ing read. Hon­est. Kun­zru has an eye for satir­i­cal detail and writes beau­ti­fully — even the most mun­dane of pas­sages has an inter­est­ing turn of phrase or an unex­pected insight; and if writ­ten this well, the menu from a British restau­rant will make a good read. It also helps that Trans­mis­sion is a short book, well paced and tautly narrated.

Here’s a fairly long excerpt…

As the bus trun­dled over the Yamuna Bridge, past the huge shore­line slum seep­ing its refuse into the river, he ran sev­eral vari­a­tions of this basic fan­tasy, tweak­ing details of dress and loca­tion, iden­tity of com­pan­ion and sound­track. The roar of pub­lic car­ri­ers receded into the back­ground. Lost in his inner retail space, he stared blankly out the win­dow, his eyes barely reg­is­ter­ing the low roofs of patch­worked thatch and blue poly­eth­yl­ene by the road­side, the ragged chil­dren stand­ing under the tan­gle of ille­gally strung pow­er­lines. High in the sky over­head was the vapor trail of a jet, a com­mer­cial flight cross­ing Indian air­space en route to Sin­ga­pore. In its first-class com­part­ment sat another trav­eler, rather more com­fort­ably than Arjun, who was squashed against the damp shoul­der of a man in a poly­ester shirt. Did Guy Swift sense some occult con­nec­tion with the boy on the bus thirty thou­sand feet below? Did he per­haps feel a tug, a pre­mo­ni­tion, the kind of unex­plained phe­nom­e­non that has as its cor­rel­a­tive a shiver or a rais­ing of the hairs on the neck or arms? No. Noth­ing. He was play­ing Tetris on the arm­rest games console.

He had just beaten his high score.

Guy Swift, thirty-three years old, UK cit­i­zen, paper mil­lion­aire and proud holder of plat­inum sta­tus on three dif­fer­ent frequent-flyer pro­grams. Guy Swift, twice Young British Mar­ket Vision­ary of the Year and holder of sev­eral Euro­brand achieve­ment awards. Guy Swift, char­ter mem­ber of a Soho club, a man genet­i­cally gifted with height, reg­u­lar fea­tures, sandy blond hair which tou­sled attrac­tively, rel­a­tively inac­tive sweat glands, clear skin and a cast-iron credit rat­ing. For two years he had lived with the reput­edly unat­tain­able Gabriella Caro, voted the most pop­u­lar girl in her class every year of her stud­ies at the Inter­na­tional School of Fine Art and Cui­sine in Lau­sanne. He had the num­ber of the door-picker at the Chang Bar on his speed dial. You would have thought he was untouchable.

Guy’s seat had eight dif­fer­ent para­me­ters, all of which could be adjusted for his com­fort and well-being. The air­line had pro­vided a pouch of toi­letries, a sleep­ing mask and a pair of dis­pos­able slip­pers embroi­dered with their new logo. He rif­fled through the pouch, ignor­ing every­thing but the slip­pers, which he turned over and over in his hands. A recent trend report had hinted that the air­line was about to break the taboo on yellow-accented greens in the cabin. But the slip­pers and accom­pa­ny­ing items were still pre­sented in a con­ser­v­a­tive blue col­or­way. Was this, he won­dered, a fail­ure of nerve?

More cham­pagne, sir? A drink of water?”

He took a glass from the smil­ing female atten­dant, unself-consciously bathing in the soft-porn ambi­ence of the moment. Men­tally he noted the expe­ri­ence as a credit on the airline’s emo­tional bal­ance sheet. He enjoyed the attendant’s android charm, the way this dis­ci­plined female body reminded him it was just a tool, the uni­formed probe-head of the large cor­po­rate machine in which he was enmeshed. He (or rather his com­pany) was pay­ing this machine to admin­is­ter a cal­cu­lated series of plea­sures and sen­sa­tions. Respect­ful of its efforts, he had for the last four hours been sit­ting as immo­bile as a hos­pi­tal patient, rel­ish­ing them one by one. The heft of china and glass, the frogspawn damp­ness of a minia­ture pot of eyegel.

The flight was well into its noc­tur­nal phase. The cabin lights had been dimmed. His fel­low pas­sen­gers had put aside their com­pli­men­tary copies of The Wall Street Jour­nal and set­tled into var­i­ous states of trance. They fell within the stan­dard demo­graphic, these first-class peo­ple, bald­ing busi­ness pates anes­thetized by meet­ings and conference-center hos­pi­tal­ity, glossy retirees occu­py­ing the stew­ards with long lists of requests. He set­tled a pair of head­phones into his ears and pressed play on his cur­rent favorite per­sonal sound­track, a mix by DJ Zizi, the res­i­dent at Ibiza super­club Ataxia. Zizi, who bestrode the Uplift­ing Ambi­ent scene like a tight-T-shirted colos­sus, had cho­sen to call his mix “Darker Shade of Chill.” It was, Guy thought, a good name, because although dark, the music was still chill. Break­ing surf, fem­i­nine moan­ing and frag­mented strings were coun­tered by foghorns and echo­ing piano. DJ Zizi was com­fort­ingly com­mit­ted to the cen­ter ground.

The music trick­led into Guy’s brain, slowly clear­ing his men­tal space like an elderly jan­i­tor stack­ing up chairs. He had a sense of angelic con­tent­ment. Here he was, exis­tent, air­borne, bring­ing the mes­sage of him­self from one point on the earth’s sur­face to another. Switch­ing his lap­top on, he tried in a half­hearted way to com­pose an e-mail to Gabriella, but con­fronted by the blank white screen he could think of noth­ing to say.

 

Books stacked on shelves, ordered using a sys­tem whose name is a mis­spelt syn­onym of con­den­sa­tion. Some­times the shelves move, scar­ing you to death if you are caught between two of them. There are rows of com­put­ers run­ning MS-DOS that try to hold peo­ple off from approach­ing the head hon­cho (or one of her assis­tants) that knows where all the books are. Try­ing to find a quote from a book takes a cou­ple of days in a brick and mor­tar library, but it is free. Most every­one is happy with the arrange­ment — authors, pub­lish­ers, librar­i­ans. Except read­ers inter­ested in a lit­tle research.

Online behe­moth bor­rows books from a few libraries, and scans them in dig­i­tally. Find­ing a quote from a book takes a few milliseconds.

Pub­lish­ers hate it. And today writ­ers have decided they hate it too. Go figure.

FAQs

    Lit  Comments Off
Sep 212005
 

When will the novel die?

When women stop reading.

When will women stop reading?

Google doesn’t know yet. Maybe Sir Vidia does.

 

Haruki Murakami writes a lovely lit­tle story called The Kidney-Shaped Stone That Moves Every Day for the New Yorker — eas­ily among the bet­ter works of fic­tion in the mag­a­zine this year.

Among the women a man meets in his life, there are only three who have real mean­ing for him. No more, no less,” his father said—or, rather, declared. He spoke coolly but with utter cer­tainty, as he might have in not­ing that the earth takes a year to revolve around the sun. Jun­pei lis­tened in silence, partly because his father’s speech was so unex­pected; he could think of noth­ing to say on the spur of the moment.

You will prob­a­bly become involved with many women in the future,” his father con­tin­ued, “but you will be wast­ing your time if a woman is the wrong one for you. I want you to remem­ber that.”

Later, sev­eral ques­tions formed in Junpei’s young mind: Has my father already met his three women? Is my mother one of them? And, if so, what hap­pened with the other two? But he was not able to ask his father these ques­tions. As noted ear­lier, the two were not on such close terms that they could speak heart to heart.

Read the full thing. It’s worth it.

 

It was a two storey house; decrepit and old; large and sprawl­ing. (yes, semi-colons are cool). It had started out nice and small, but the arrival of kids and money had led to ran­dom addi­tions of bed­rooms and bath­rooms, and by the time the kids had stopped arriv­ing, the house looked out­landishly ugly — decreipt and old; large and sprawling.

Soon the kids grew up, jobs and mar­riages hap­pened and the house was too big for just one cou­ple. So, they decided to rent it out. Even though they didn’t ask for a lot of money, there were no tak­ers: Who would want to have to go through a bath­room to get from one room to another?

No tak­ers but one, that is: A doc­tor who was just start­ing out wanted to turn the house into his clinic. There were heated nego­ti­a­tions (my mom said), and finally Dr. Lak­sh­manan, who had inher­ited a lot of money from his dad, ended up buy­ing it outright.

I didn’t know any of this when I was a six year old prone to falling off bicy­cles. All I knew was that I hated every minute I spent on the hard wooden benches in the Doctor’s wait­ing room — filled with dread, the unpleas­ant smell a sure pre­cur­sor to the painful shots that would follow.

The clinic fol­lowed a unique model of queu­ing: every few min­utes the doc­tor would come out of his room and scan the peo­ple wait­ing to see him. Then, with no appar­ent rea­son, he would pick some­one and say, “You come in!” It didn’t mat­ter if the guy had just entered the clinic or had been wait­ing there for ever: that was that. If my mom was with me, my turn would come sooner (“Teacher, Vaanga”), if I was with Ayyamma it was always “Hold on for a few more min­utes, kid!”

When my turn did come, I’d enter the room, sit on a chrome-topped stool next to the Doc­tor and wait for him to begin the exam­i­na­tion. He’d brusquely ask me a few ques­tions (“Eat well?” “Pee ok?” ), and bark out a few instruc­tions (“Open your mouth” “Breathe deep”) that didn’t seem to have any imme­di­ate rel­e­vance to my bleed­ing elbow, and tell who­ever my adult accom­pa­ni­ment on the day was: “Every­thing looks ok, no prob­lem.” We’d then pay him five rupees.

He’d scrib­ble some­thing on a piece of paper and ask me to take it to one of his nurses. Some­times, there’d be no paper, and he’d just come out of his room through another door and yell, “White Med­i­cine, small syringe for Babu.” A painful shot, a muted scream and then I was free to go home.

I hated the whole expe­ri­ence and thought the doc­tor, his clinic and the nurse sucked royally.

But strangely, not many peo­ple shared my low opin­ion of the doc­tor. Patients came from all over to see him and rumor has it that Cheran Trans­port Cor­po­ra­tion intro­duced a spe­cial bus that took a cir­cuitous route through sev­eral vil­lages just to accom­mo­date his patients. The house was always packed, and every square inch of it that was not a bath­room had a bed. Every bed had a patient of one fla­vor or the other — deliri­ous with fever, scream­ing in pain, drips attached to arms, just wait­ing out a night to catch the first bus tomor­row. When I asked my mom why he was so pop­u­lar, she’d always tell me the same thing — “He’s a good man, that’s why.”

As I grew older, a few more doc­tors sprung up in the neigh­bor­hood. My dad and I were tired of the long lines, and the no-frills ser­vice, so we switched to another doc­tor who had bet­ter wait­ing rooms and used thin­ner nee­dles. My mom though was stub­born — “no one but him for me.”

So, I still had to go to Dr. Lakshmanan’s place with my mom, but times had changed and I was her accom­pa­ni­ment. Even though it had been nearly ten years since I first went there, times hadn’t changed at the clinic– the same ques­tions, the same diet, and the same white med­i­cine (peni­cillin, I knew now). And the same five rupees for a con­sul­ta­tion.

I was start­ing to understand.

Later, on one of those days she felt like it, my mom told me that just before he died, the doctor’s dad — rich land­lord — asked his son to use his edu­ca­tion to serve the poor. And just like that, he did. Never asked for more than five rupees from any­one, even when syringes started to cost more than that, even when they were in the hos­pi­tal for months, even when they couldn’t afford to buy foodand he had to pay Devi Tea Stall to deliver them bar­ley kanji every day. She also told me that the queu­ing method wasn’t as ran­dom as I thought — the doc­tor had a timetable at his desk of whose bus left when.

Last year, Dr. Lak­sh­manan died. It was abrupt, my mom said. He went home for lunch, and died of a heart attack after his meal. His two daugh­ters were around when it hap­pened, but it hap­pened all too sud­denly and it doesn’t look like that there were any promises extracted. The daugh­ters run a bou­tique in the house now.

Skin Deep

    Lit  Comments Off
Sep 152005
 

Stephen Met­calf reviews On Beauty for Slate, part of their Book Blitz this fall, and rec­om­mends that the Booker com­mit­tee not award her the prize.

I rec­om­mend this not because Smith isn’t richly, almost absurdly, talented—which she is—and not because On Beauty isn’t a good book, because it is. I offer my rec­om­men­da­tion because Smith, being so young, is too con­tent to write well only in auro­ral bursts; too ready to con­cede a char­ac­ter to stereo­type; and, in the pres­ence of seri­ous ideas, too quick to be woolly-headed and imprecise.

In typ­i­cal Slate fash­ion — irrev­er­ent and blunt — Met­calfe describes the book as banal,

The sec­ond rea­son On Beauty might have res­cued itself from its own ten­dency to top­i­cal banal­ity is sim­ply this: It is writ­ten by an exquis­ite writer, who has mis­taken her admirable pooh-poohing of a lot of fool­ish pub­lic­ity for a free pass to get by as an overcel­e­brated mediocrity.

Oooh, that must hurt. He tries to make amends with this, but the dam­age has already been done.

There­fore, Dear Com­mit­tee, I plead with you to assist in remov­ing the cam­eras and quote-mongers from Zadie Smith’s life and help pre­vent her from blow­ing up into an even larger global lit­er­ary dar­ling, prone to even more gra­tu­itous Hamlet-like maun­der­ings, and let the woman who could write the fol­low­ing develop into her appointed greatness:

“Always off some­where, yes,” said Howard genially, but it did not seem to him he trav­eled so very much, though when he did it was more and fur­ther than he wished. He thought of his own father again—compared to him, Howard was Phineas Fogg. Travel had seemed the key to the king­dom, back then. One dreamed of a life that would enable travel. Howard looked through his win­dow at a lamp-post buried to its waist in snow sup­port­ing two chained-up, frozen bikes, iden­ti­fi­able only by the tips of their han­dle­bars. He imag­ined wak­ing up this morn­ing and dig­ging his bike out of the snow and rid­ing to a proper job, the kind Belseys had had for gen­er­a­tions, and found he couldn’t imag­ine it. This inter­ested Howard, for a moment: the idea that he could no longer gauge the lux­u­ries of his own life.

 

The No.1 Ladies’ Detec­tive Agency is cool for a num­ber of rea­sons, but the best part about the series is the lead char­ac­ter — Mma. Ramotswe. She is the first really lik­able detec­tive I’ve come across — unas­sum­ing and pleas­ant; some­one you could hang out with, and make easy con­ver­sa­tion about Botswan­ian pol­i­tics over a cup of tea.

No one else comes even close.

I’ve heard quite a few peo­ple claim that they love Sher­lock Holmes, but I am not sure they know what true love means. Holmes, if you recall, was the deduc­tive genius con­structed from bones and brain who sub­sisted on tobacco and said things like “It’s ele­men­tary, my dear Wat­son” (although his han­dlers now say he was mis­quoted). Now he is the type of per­son that inspired awe, not love. He was a skill­ful detec­tive, who was aware — too aware — of his skill. He was moody and aloof, and seemed to pre­fer hang­ing out with dumb doctors.

If he were to stop by unan­nouced at my house one of these days, I’d be leery of let­ting him in. Not with­out clear­ing my list of vis­ited sites, and mak­ing sure my shoes were out of eye­shot, with no traces of soil on the soles. I’d make him a generic brand of tea — char­ac­ter­less — and make sure I drink my tea when he is not around. I’d fret about the way I eat my food, and make sure I don’t look at any­thing on the wall when think­ing about stuff — this dude can pick up trains of thought. Thank you very much, but I’d rather watch him drink­ing tea with you.

Who else, I wonder.

Miss Marple was pos­si­bly a hot­tie (if and) when she was young, and could some­times make intu­itve leaps that could shame Holmes, but she was bor­ing and mean. She was an anachro­nism even in her time, and talk­ing to her over tea would be umm.. bor­ing. And there is the small mat­ter of her think­ing of us young folks as fools.

Per­haps the only thing that would make me do it with her (why do you snicker? I meant the act of drink­ing tea) is the threat of an evening with Poirot. Uggh. I shud­der when I think of the reac­tions at the restau­rant when I walk in with this fun­nily dressed dude with an upturned moustache.

Although I think it would be kinda cool if I take him to the local restau­rant that plays “Man­galu Man­galu” all the time. (Alright, Alright that was a lame ref­er­ence: just because Poirot’s mous­tache is upturned doesn’t mean he looks as bad as Aamir Khan does in Man­gal Pandey).

Mar­lowe? No way. How long can you stand some­one wise­crack­ing through the sides of their mouth? And that, by the way, rules out most of the detec­tive pop­u­lace since Marlowe.

Well, maybe young Christo­pher would fit the bill — we could talk prime num­bers and the big bang the­ory — but he’s a lit­tle too young. And com­ing to think of it, pet detec­tives don’t count. So no Christo­pher, and (thank good­ness) no Ace Ven­tura.

© 2012 etcetera Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Switch to our mobile site