Oct 082005
 

John Le Carre, who used to write spy thrillers before he started in his cur­rent job as a writer of anti-Capitalist rants dis­guised as nov­els, dis­cusses his pol­i­tics (more than his books) in this ran­corous Guardian inter­view that would make a Naipaul proud. If you sift through the stri­dent attacks (on Blair, the US, anti-egalitarian estab­lish­ments, pub­lic schools) there are some inter­est­ing bits, like this one where he talks about movie adap­ta­tions of his books.

[…] it is unusual for Corn­well to feel other than mauled when his books hit the screen.

I have been through the sheep dip with movies before but, like every­body else, I blame myself. I have writ­ten what I thought were very attrac­tive books that have bro­ken down badly for film. If they weren’t sat­is­fac­tory movies, I was part of the process that made them unsat­is­fac­tory. I don’t feel that I was used or tra­duced, but many weren’t very good. Some, though, were. The film of The Spy Who Came In from the Cold was pretty good. Tin­ker Tai­lor was really good.” He under­stand­ably for­bears from nam­ing those sheep-dip adap­ta­tions, but The Rus­sia House, The Lit­tle Drum­mer Girl and The Tai­lor of Panama are surely contenders.

And now, in Cornwell’s esti­ma­tion, the adap­ta­tion of The Con­stant Gar­dener is really good, too.

Le Carre is not a ranter. His will­ing­ness to make polit­i­cal state­ments out of his books makes their lit­er­ary qual­ity suf­fer — the writ­ing is too stri­dent and lacks the flair that’s needed to make the pol­i­tics palat­able. A flair that Kurt Von­negut, for instance, had loads and loads of.

And through Book­Slut, here is a Von­negut inter­view on USA Today to pro­mote his new book, A Man With­out a Coun­try.

What do you want to talk about? Pol­i­tics? Our pres­i­dent is a com­plete twit. I’ll talk about the death of the novel. I’ll talk about any­thing you want.”

You may not know from the inter­view, but Cat’s Cra­dle and Slaugh­ter­house Five are per­haps the best exam­ples of overtly polit­i­cal books with lit­er­ary merit — they are great reads even if the pol­i­tics is unpalatable.

  3 Responses to “Left Hooks”

  1. Well, the man’s get­ting old and senile — isn’t he like 90 or some­thing now? And do agree, whether you agree with the pol­i­tics or not(I do but thats besides the point), he used to write great satire. Who talked about the Dres­den bomb­ings in those days anyway?

  2. Veena, assum­ing you are talk­ing about Von­negut — they are both old and senile ;) — he was an out­stand­ing satirist. I would prob­a­bly put him up there with Heller, almost.

  3. wow this is a nice arti­col I like it

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

   
© 2012 etcetera Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Switch to our mobile site