On the ability of a prizewinning book to change minds

Banville doesn’t always help his own case. A few hours before the ceremony he confided to an American journalist that The Sea was “a bad book”. [Link]

‘It is nice,” said John Banville on Monday night, “to see a work of art win the Booker prize.”[Link]

Comments (5 comments)

I suppose Banville could still save face because he did not really say good work of art :)

And Karthik - why is Banville getting so much of footage on Stochastica in the last couple of days? Changing opinions are we? ;)

Lavanya / October 14th, 2005, 3:26 am / #

Hows the book by the way? The review was not very kind.

Gp / October 14th, 2005, 5:35 am / #

Lavanya, I am very neutral on Banville. I haven’t read a book by him - my two posts have been pointers to articles about him winning the Booker. I am trying to get hold of The Sea, and I promise, I’ll give it a fair shot. :)

Gp, Haven’t read the book but yes, the reviews haven’t been very kind like you say.

Karthik / October 14th, 2005, 9:09 am / #

Bring out the writer in you! Weave a story! Watch your story unfold with your fellow bloggers.New twists, new turns while this absurd fiction goes places. See your story through virtual eyes.

Visit my blog for more details.

http://www.bachelorblues.blogspot.com

Anonymous / October 14th, 2005, 10:30 pm / #

[...] A New Yorker review of The Economy of Prestige, a book by James English where he argues that “the threat of scandal” is essential to the viabilty of a literary award, and that it is “at least as important that the prize go to the wrong person as that it go to the right one.” That explains Banville. (sorry Lavanya). [...]

+: etcetera :+ » Get in line, please - there’s enough prizes for everyone! / December 22nd, 2005, 2:10 am / #

Post a comment