Where I'm Calling FromA strik­ing fea­ture of the Lord of the Rings books is the author’s vivid ren­der­ing of Mid­dle Earth. J.R.R Tolkien chose an imag­i­nary set­ting for his books, but he pro­vided his read­ers so much infor­ma­tion about them – maps, his­tor­i­cal con­texts, evoca­tive descrip­tions of land­scapes — that it was hard to believe that the whole thing was made up. Tolkien filled his books with an over­whelm­ing amount of descrip­tive detail at every oppor­tu­nity he could, cre­at­ing an array of detailed snap­shots of the set­ting for read­ers. The effect was some­thing unusual – a cred­i­ble fantasy.

Styl­is­ti­cally, there couldn’t be a writer far­ther away from Tolkien than Ray­mond Carver. Where Tolkien would use a hun­dred words, Carver uses ten; where Tolkien’s char­ac­ters wax poetic, Carver’s just grunt. Tolkien took pride in the length (and breadth) of his works, Carver was a min­i­mal­ist from the Hem­ing­way school.

But after read­ing Where I’m Call­ing From, Carver’s last col­lec­tion of short sto­ries before his pre­ma­ture death, one can’t help feel­ing that Carver did to the human being what Tolkien did to Mid­dle Earth — his sto­ries are a series of sil­hou­ettes that spot­light the world of his sub­jects. Like Tolkien’s ver­bose snap­shots, the sil­hou­ettes work rather well. No writer I’ve read comes close to cap­tur­ing the tex­tured world of the guy next door as well as Carver does here.

Carver’s most remark­able achieve­ment is the gen­uine­ness of his char­ac­ters. A few sen­tences into every story a famil­iar­ity envelops you – you’ve met these peo­ple, you know how they talk – fol­lowed by awe at how true it all sounds. The dad in Bicy­cles, Mus­cles, Cig­a­rettes could’ve so eas­ily been mine; the odd cou­ple in Put your­self in My Shoes could’ve been the weird peo­ple next door that maids hated to work for.

The whole expe­ri­ence of read­ing a Carver book is mind-blowing – it is like watch­ing events unfold at your neighbor’s house through a sky­light. And it is here that the author’s spare style comes in so handy – Carver keeps his descrip­tions down to a min­i­mum, let­ting the reader’s imag­i­na­tion fill in the back­drop: these peo­ple could be your neigh­bors as much as they are mine.

A lot has been writ­ten about Carver’s min­i­mal­ist style, but while his writ­ing is spare and stark, he has an amaz­ing eye for just the right details – pass­ing men­tions of an odd stray dog, a wet shoe or daddy’s mus­cles some­how lend a more com­plete feel to the sto­ries, and the over­all effect is that of some­thing way more than the sum of its parts. (I so want to pun on his spare sen­tence con­struc­tion and him not spar­ing a detail, but I’ll pass).

In “What’s in Alaska,” for exam­ple, two cou­ples get together for an evening. And as the evening pro­gresses, laced with drink­ing and drugs, Carver chooses to focus a lot of atten­tion on the brand new shoes of one of the men – his doubts about the shoes seem to some­how mir­ror how he feels about the changes in his life. It is totally unex­pected, and incred­i­bly poignant.

Mid­way through the book, there seems to be a slight shift in Carver’s style. He’s a lit­tle more chatty, and the tales have a sun­nier feel to them. You could sense a writer try­ing to break free from a style that was start­ing to cramp him, but unfor­tu­nately for Carver (and us) his life ended before he could fin­ish his experimentation.

Accord­ing to this essay by William Stull, pro­fes­sor at the Uni­ver­sity of Hart­ford, some­time after the pub­li­ca­tion of What We Talk About When We Talk About Love Carver thought he would hit a dead end if he con­tin­ued to head down the path of increased min­i­mal­ism, and

[…]what fol­lowed over the next two years was an artis­tic turn­about, “an open­ing up” dur­ing which he restored and expanded the work he had pared down under the influ­ence of edi­tor Lish, Hemingway’s “the­ory of omis­sion,” and his own purga­tive impulses. Two small-press books, Fires and If It Please You, dis­play the out­come of this process. In addi­tion, Carver wrote a dozen new sto­ries in a higher, more hope­ful key. The first of them, “Cathe­dral” (Atlantic Monthly, Sep­tem­ber 1981), he termed “totally dif­fer­ent in con­cep­tion and exe­cu­tion” from his pre­vi­ous work.

Truth, I’m sure you’ve heard, is stranger than fic­tion. If you believe that, then Carver’s short sto­ries are the clos­est fic­tion can get to the truth.

Update: Here’s Fal­staff on Carver. Neat.

  16 Responses to “Simply Beautiful”

  1. I’ve never read Carver, but it now finds a spot on my to-read list! Any rec­om­men­da­tions for a first pick?

  2. Hmm.. this one “Where I’m Call­ing From” is good. It has a lot of sto­ries from his pre­vi­ous col­lec­tions, and seven new ones.

  3. I am going to read Carver as soon as I can. Thanks for writ­ing such a beau­ti­ful and effec­tive rec­om­men­da­tion Karthik.

  4. Great post, thanks!

  5. Lavanya thanks. And thanks for the shout out over at your blog.

    Jai, Thanks.

  6. If only I could write like this. Great piece Karthik.

  7. Chenthil, Bart: thanks. There is noth­ing cooler than rec­om­mend­ing a book to some­one and hav­ing them go off and read it (and like it, hopefully).

  8. A very well-written review. Came here through Chenthil. You’ve made me feel “I should start read­ing books again…”. Thanks for the first pick in my next innings.

  9. A good write, Ill get the book soon! Thanx!

  10. nice review. del.icio.us-ly tagged as “toread”.
    hope to get to it soon!

  11. Awe­some review. Now I have one more book to buy :( I was going to allow myself Two Lives as a birth­day gift to myself, but damn it, I am now tempted to give myself a sub­stan­tial gift card at B&N…Even gifts to your­self can’t be cheapo affairs any more…

  12. Gp, Prash,Doz .. thanks. And happy birth­day to you DoZ, when­ever that is :) You prob­a­bly won’t regret givng your­self a Carver.

  13. Thank you, Karthik :) The spe­cial day doesn’t come around for months, but I like to line up excuses to buy books well in advance :D

  14. Have only read a cou­ple of short sto­ries, was not too impressed :-(

  15. […] So I won, and we ended up going to Thava­mai Thavamirun­thu, directed by Cheran — the guy that made Auto­graph — and star­ring him­self and a new girl called Padmapriya. After the movie, I had a pretty long con­ver­sa­tion with Smith about what I was going to write in my review of the movie, and as we were wrap­ping up, he begged me to pub­lish the con­ver­sa­tion on this blog to pro­vide peo­ple a win­dow into his soul. He also wanted me to tell peo­ple that Xaviera Hol­lan­der is so much bet­ter than Ray­mond Carver. […]

  16. The Long And Wind­ing Bore

    My favorite pas­time is talk­ing to myself. Not many peo­ple know this, but I am actu­ally two peo­ple: There lurks inside me this crass dude called Smith who thinks this blog is truck­loads of bull and peri­od­i­cally tries to convince…

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

   
© 2012 etcetera Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Switch to our mobile site