A New Yorker review of The Econ­omy of Pres­tige, a book by James Eng­lish where he argues that “the threat of scan­dal” is essen­tial to the via­bilty of a lit­er­ary award, and that it is “at least as impor­tant that the prize go to the wrong per­son as that it go to the right one.” That explains Banville. (sorry Lavanya).

When the first Nobel Prize in Lit­er­a­ture went to Sully Prud­homme, in 1901, the choice was regarded as a scan­dal, since Leo Tol­stoy hap­pened to be alive. The Swedish Acad­emy was so unnerved by the pub­lic crit­i­cism it received that its mem­bers made a point of pass­ing over Tol­stoy for the rest of his life—just to show, appar­ently, that they knew what they were doing the first time around—honoring instead such immor­tals as Bjørn­st­jerne Bjørn­son, José Echegaray, Hen­ryk Sienkiewicz, Gio­suè Car­ducci, Rudolf Eucken, and Selma Lagerlöf.

Eng­lish says that for prizes to “mat­ter” they need to be thought of as “fun­da­men­tally scan­dalous” by the pub­lic — scan­dalous in the sense that art should really have noth­ing to do with win­ning or losing.

In English’s view, there­fore, [Toni] Morrison’s friends and admir­ers vio­lated the pro­to­cols of prize-bashing not because they pub­licly crit­i­cized the choice of the National Book Award judges but because they acknowl­edged that the award really mat­ters, that it is (in their words) a “key­stone honor” that helps to val­i­date a book and estab­lish its author. Their state­ment pointed out, in the frank­est terms, that there is a lit­er­ary mar­ket­place, and that power and authority–“cultural cap­i­tal,” to use the term that Eng­lish bor­rows from the soci­ol­o­gist Pierre Bourdieu–accrue to those who suc­ceed in it. Art does not receive its reward in Heaven; it is one of the things that belong to Caesar.

Eng­lish spec­u­lates that this will­ing­ness to speak with­out embar­rass­ment about the sig­nif­i­cance of prizes and awards, and about the whole econ­omy of cul­tural pro­duc­tion and con­sump­tion, may, para­dox­i­cally, sig­nal the demise of the prize system.

The book also sounds a hope­ful note for wannabe creators:

There are now more movie awards given out every year–about nine thousand–than there are new movies, and the num­ber of lit­er­ary prizes is climb­ing much faster than the num­ber of books published.

Nice. I’ll remem­ber that for the next time I run into an award win­ning writer.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

   
© 2012 etcetera Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Switch to our mobile site